igenlode: The pirate sloop 'Horizon' from "Treasures of the Indies" (Default)
Well, I wasn't really expecting that...

Tried the Sherlock Personality Quiz (it does say "you might be surprised who you end up getting"), and while the -- truthful -- multiple-choice answers I gave weren't the ones that I would have identified as the obvious 'Holmes set', the result was quite unambiguous.


You are Sherlock Holmes. The smartest person in any room (unless your brother is there), you frequently drive people crazy with your rude tone, frighteningly meticulous eye for detail and rapid-fire conversation. Some find your brusque demeanor and total disregard for social norms off-putting and you might have a hard time making friends. But you're shockingly loyal to the (very few) people you choose to associate with voluntarily and there's definitely a heart buried somewhere under all that arrogance. Your friend is probably right about the solar system being important, though, so maybe you should look it up.



On the whole I think I'm slightly flattered... which suggests the result is not that inaccurate!





And on their Downton Abbey quiz, I'm apparently Lord Grantham. Which again I would not have expected -- and find more flattering than I would have thought -- but the way they put it, it actually makes sense...

Now to work out what will result when you take the intersection of those two characters! (Pride and loyalty, I suspect.)
igenlode: The pirate sloop 'Horizon' from "Treasures of the Indies" (Default)
I went to see the new film "Sherlock Holmes: A Game of Shadows" -- despite having avoided its predecessor after being completely alienated by its advertising. (I had nothing against the idea of Holmes as swordsman, martial artist and manic Victorian eccentric -- all these arguably having basis in canon -- but the marketing managed to convince me that this film really wasn't aimed at me.) However a friend assured me that the film had actually been quite fun, and the trailer for this sequel made it look reasonably promising, while the Guardian's notoriously picky critic Peter Bradshaw gave it a 4/5 review. So I went. (Despite the fact that pictures at the local multiplex are now nearly twice as expensive for me as classics at the BFI.)

Robert E. Downey as Sherlock Holmes )


But when compared to the start of the BBC's new "Sherlock" season it delivered absolutely no contest. "A Scandal in Belgravia" was genuinely witty (it even contrives a credible modern-day set-up for Sherlock to be photographed in that famous deerstalker) and on occasion chilling (e.g. Sherlock taking revenge for an attack on Mrs Hudson -- a set-up in which he displays simultaneously more human and more cold-blooded actions than his custom) while displaying a formidable intelligence. My heart had sunk at the announcement that Moffatt/Gatiss planned to trot out Irene Adler (who, despite the Sherlockian mythology erected around her, actually appears in only one early story in the canon and is effectively forgotten ever after) to feature in their 21st-century 'reboot': oh no, it's going to be 'Holmes in love' again.

But in fact it isn't )

I didn't think this episode was quite so good as the opening one of the first series (the timeline felt a bit bitsy, and overall running time came across as too long as they kept piling more and more complications into the plot: I think it could have been streamlined to a shorter slot). However, it was better than any of the others so far, and an infinite improvement on the very disappointing Moriarty reveal with which we were left last time: an excellent omen for forthcoming episodes.
igenlode: The pirate sloop 'Horizon' from "Treasures of the Indies" (Default)
Here's the blog entry I would have posted on MySpace, before I discovered that my ability to post there at all had apparently been discontinued...



Wed August 18th, 2010

Apparently my last blog entry vanished into the aether -- probably just as well...

I've been watching a lot more television than usual. Decided to have a look at "Mad Men" when the BBC started re-running the series from the beginning, since everyone has been raving about it for years. In a similar situation, I never got beyond the first episode of "The Sopranos"; I've managed two weeks of this so far, but am not really hooked. Presumably it's being very post-modernist in that the (apparent) main protagonist isn't actually very likeable, but I'm oldfashioned enough to find this a barrier to being drawn in. The only person I really felt for was the immature Pete Campbell in the most recent (4th) episode; and I really can't identify with either...

"Sherlock", on the other hand, I unequivocally enjoyed. Benedict Cumberbatch is a performer whose career I've been watching with interest for some years (and I have -- somewhere -- the scrapbook clipping to prove it), so when the "Guardian" ran a big article trailing his appearance in a new TV series I was a little annoyed to discover that it was going to take place during the two weeks I was away! Managed to tape the second episode, and despite a slight disorientation during the opening scenes (who was who? where on earth are they? Watson in the supermarket?!) very soon found myself into the swing of things and thoroughly enjoying the cameraderie and wit. I was inspired enough to go to some lengths to seek out the first episode, which I ultimately managed to watch in two chunks split across the transmission of the third, and currently last, screen adventure -- the latter, unfortunately, was something of a let-down (particularly as I'd been praising it to the skies in advance to everyone who would listen), with the ending undermined by a giggling Moriarty. But returning to the closing sections of the first episode reconfirmed my initial impression; this is potentially really, really good.

(And for once I get the satisfaction of watching the media raving about something I've actually seen and liked; usually I'm either alienated or utterly disconnected!)
Page generated 9 January 2026 09:59 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios