igenlode: The pirate sloop 'Horizon' from "Treasures of the Indies" (Default)
I had an extraordinary dream in which my *mother* was engaged to Robespierre (who was pretending to be blind) under orders from the British Government, who were holding him in captivity. He apparently decided that this was a fate worse than death and that he would prefer to be executed, at which she was understandably both dismayed and relieved. My subconscious then reminded me that he was very short-sighted, which would serve as an excuse for the feigned blindness, and I woke up. This is the sort of thing that happens after you stumble across the existence of Robespierre fangirls while attempting to check historical details on the Internet...

Robespierre fangirls )

My face-claim for the Comte de Brencourt: Raymond Massey in "A Matter of Life and Death"

But F. Murray Abrahams as Salieri is something in the same line, as well.
igenlode: The pirate sloop 'Horizon' from "Treasures of the Indies" (Default)
Missing scenes from F de L'Opera's Tumblr posts cut and pasted here (so that I can link to them from the original post!)
Raoul's proposal )
Sorelli and the Count and Christine )
igenlode: The pirate sloop 'Horizon' from "Treasures of the Indies" (Default)
The story is not going well — I need to rewrite the wretched 'voyage of the Résurgence' chapter again as a result of having rewritten the end of it and unbalanced the whole thing, and I haven't even attempted the task. And the chapter that ought to be easy going, Raoul and Christine's reunion, is proving very heavy work and I suspect unsatisfactory in similar ways (because I'm doing the same thing, trying to replace writing an action sequence — in this case Christine's adventures in the mountains after escaping Erik — by a brief in-text summary from the character).

On the other hand, I have a face-claim for Arctic Raoul, beard, frostbite, rag-tag clothing and all :-)
image )
igenlode: The pirate sloop 'Horizon' from "Treasures of the Indies" (Default)
E.M.K.81 has come up with a highly convincing theory about the opera that was being staged on the night following Christine's disastrous disappearance during "Faust": we are told that it is a piece by Meyerbeer (about whom Erik is disparaging) and we know that he plans to commit suicide by proxy through Christine at eleven o'clock, "at the height of the evening performance" according to the Persian.

Now, it so happens that we know of one specific Meyerbeer opera that was in the current repertory of the Paris Opera at the time of this story: Le Prophète, the historical melodrama which featured the white horse César who is trained for the purpose and stolen by Erik. And it turns out that the finale of Le Prophète just happens to involve the heroine setting off an explosion in a powder magazine which destroys the building and the revelling crowd inside it. The coincidence seems far too great: Erik deliberately delays his explosion until the end of that night's performance in order to mirror events upstairs in a fit of dramatic irony.

It seems very likely that Leroux intended the next night's performance to be "Le Prophète"...
igenlode: The pirate sloop 'Horizon' from "Treasures of the Indies" (Default)

Yet more stuff archived here for reference so that I don't have to keep searching through unhelpfully-named messages in order to locate my own analysis again...

I'd always taken it absolutely for granted that this scene represented clever Christine *refusing* to play the Phantom's game, refusing his devil's bargain ("spend your life with me or send your lover to his grave") and finding a third way that saves all of them. The Phantom demands that she give him a Yes or No answer, and she does neither: she tells him he's human and says 'you poor creature, have a kiss'. She does *not* consent to marry him, and she gets precisely the result she was (presumably) hoping for -- she shocks him back into reality from his power-mad high and shows him that what he is doing is abominable, and he lets her go.

I don't think that Christine in the musical ever does decide to spend the rest of her life underground in order to save Raoul; I think that her kiss is an attempt to find a third option beyond the two that the Phantom offered ("love me and he lives, refuse and he dies"). In the novel, of course, the threat and the situation are both somewhat different...

But I always assumed that what she is trying to do in the musical is to show the Phantom that "he is not alone" — that his face is not an insurmountable barrier to contact with humanity as he claims to believe. I don't believe that her kiss is supposed to be an acceptance of his bargain or a signal that she will marry him: there are easier and more reliable ways of telling him that! The kiss appears to be a rejection of both choices and an attempt to win his sympathy by demonstrating empathy — it's the classic 'communicate with your kidnapper and force him to see you as a human being so that he will find it harder to kill or torture you' tactic.

She isn't accepting his proposal (which she would have done with words of hatred and resentment); she is showing him that it is possible for someone to display enough pity to bestow a kiss of her own free will and without blackmail even upon someone who looks like him, and therefore that his face does not make him irredeemable.

I always assumed it was obvious...

Erik says "Will you marry me? Yes or No?"
Christine says "You poor thing, have a kiss" -- which is neither Yes nor No, but is greater sweetness and pity than he would have got from the Yes answer.
And the result is that he then shows pity and humanity to her by sparing Raoul, which I imagine is what she hoped for but presumably could not possibly be certain of.


I've never seen the final lair scene as Christine's choice to stay with Erik -- it never even occurred to me that anyone would make that assumption until a fan mentioned it as a casual belief a few months back. Erik says "Make your choice", but Christine *refuses* to play that game. She *doesn't* choose: if she wanted to say Yes she would say it with tears and loathing, as she does at the start of the scene. If she wanted to say No she would hurl it at him.

What wise, clear-sighted Christine does is to evade the question altogether: her response is neither to accept the trap or to give her tormentor an excuse to take his revenge. Erik says "Yes or No?" Christine says "Oh, you poor thing -- here, have a kiss."

And it works. By showing him that he is part of humanity, she gets him to see her as someone whose happiness he cares about, and not as a possession.

It's the classic kidnap gambit, really: instil empathy in your captors and get them to see you as a person. It's ideal. Under the impossible circumstances it's *brilliant* -- and it's very Christine. She forgives her enemies, and in so doing she wins freedom by her own resourcefulness.

I always rather admired musical-Christine's cleverness in the final act -- if you notice, she *doesn't* accept the terms of the Phantom's 'choice'. Leroux-Christine does; she turns the scorpion to signify that she agrees to marry Erik in order to stop him blowing up the Opera House, and then promises not to kill herself in order to save Raoul's life even though she knows they can't be together. But musical-Christine refuses to choose the grasshopper *or* the scorpion: she avoids the Yes/No choice that the Phantom places before her, and she shortcircuits it (and him!) by kissing him instead :-p

She doesn't agree to marry him (given the state of relations between them at that point, she would probably have flung any consent furiously into his face) and she doesn't trigger retribution by refusing. Instead she shows him pity -- she shows him that he is not alone, that he is not an exile from the human race, and that his existence doesn't have to be the way it is. Christine says neither Yes nor No, because, as the Phantom has pointed out, that's a choice she cannot win. She says "You poor thing, have a kiss"... and in so doing (though she cannot have known that this would work; she can only have hoped to break him free from his monomaniac focus, throw him off guard and win a breathing space to think again) she pulls him free from his downward spiral into madness and saves them all.

igenlode: The pirate sloop 'Horizon' from "Treasures of the Indies" (Default)

I thought I'd already linked to this, but apparently not... For my reference, then (so that I don't have to keep searching for it), F. de l'opera's theory that Christine's 'red scarf' was actually a peasant headscarf:

http://operafantomet.tumblr.com/post/96354400557/fdelopera-operafantomet-fdelopera
Read more... )

igenlode: The pirate sloop 'Horizon' from "Treasures of the Indies" (Horizon)
http://dorkshadows.tumblr.com/post/86306038171/
Raoul chasing Christine across space and time, even if it takes ten, twenty-five, a hundred lifetimes. )

The images I recognise are amazingly apt to the captions ("is that really you?" for the very un-Leroux-like Christine of the animated version, "all the lifetimes in which one of us doesn't exist" for Philippe/Christine from the Yeston/Kopit Phantom and Raoul/Lucille from "Monstre à Paris"), and I suspect that if one could identify them all there would be an additional layer of meaning! I can't help wondering which is the lifetime "in which you kill me"...
igenlode: The pirate sloop 'Horizon' from "Treasures of the Indies" (Horizon)

I had the inspiration a while ago that Lars Hanson would have been the ideal casting for Leroux-Raoul in the silent era: he can play fair, delicate and conflicted, but also hot-headed and impulsive.

So I was amused to come across a couple of stills from the Mauritz Stiller "Erotikon" (1920)-- a film which apparently deals with Eros rather than erotica -- which, when taken out of context, could easily appear as shots from a 1920s "Phantom of the Opera" movie with an authentically Swedish Christine!

Raoul is carried away by Christine's singing as she accompanies herself at the piano (Preben Wells and Irene in "Erotikon")

Raoul and Philippe quarrel over the girl (Preben warns Professor Leo in "Erotikon")

Edit (for my records) — a nineteenth-century Raoul:

Read more... )

Page generated 24 May 2025 06:24 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios