(what, you mean that really happened? I'd been left with the general impression that Dumas had made the whole secret romance thing up for plot purposes...!)
I don't see how refusing to give asylum to his daughter and her husband helped the inheritance problem -- if anything happened to Prince Charles, Elizabeth would *still* become his heir and her husband King of England, whether they were in the country or not. Unless he was hoping that someone would conveniently kill Poor Frederick off for him if given maximum opportunity?
NB I thought you might find this article on French military garb in 1643 interesting in terms of comparison with English Civil War clothing -- I came across it while trying to get a decent idea of what fastenings little Jakob would have had to deal with in order to be able to dress himself. Laces and/or *lots* of buttons :-P https://www.lemondededartagnan.org/sites/default/files/2023-12/le-mousquetaire-de-rocroi.pdf
(And people wore haut-de-chausses (i.e. from the waist to the knee) -- the garments later called culottes -- *not* the 'braies' adopted universally by the BBC Musketeers fandom to allude to men's nether garments, one of their favourite subjects :-p)
The contemporary illustrations on P2 are fascinating in that they show, not the King's Musketeers (an elite royal mounted troop equivalent to the Life Guard and the Royals) but the actual infantry drilling with muskets in their shabby clothing, including a worn-out scabbard through which the point of the sword protrudes ,and sagging false boot-tops, worn above unglamorous souliers to make it look as if the owner could afford to buy boots....
It dawned on me for the first time recently when watching clips from the Soviet Musketeers just *why* Cavalier boots have those enormous turned-down tops -- they are in fact thigh-length riding boots and worn as such (or were originally worn as such) when on horseback! Presumably they were turned down below the knee for convenience when dismounted, and then developed into an exaggerated fashion statement ;-)
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
timeasmymeasure
no subject
Date: 2026-01-29 07:53 am (UTC)Partly for the Dumas refence in one of the comments.
no subject
Date: 2026-01-29 11:03 pm (UTC)and hit on Queen Anne again:-D(what, you mean that really happened? I'd been left with the general impression that Dumas had made the whole secret romance thing up for plot purposes...!)
I don't see how refusing to give asylum to his daughter and her husband helped the inheritance problem -- if anything happened to Prince Charles, Elizabeth would *still* become his heir and her husband King of England, whether they were in the country or not. Unless he was hoping that someone would conveniently kill Poor Frederick off for him if given maximum opportunity?
no subject
Date: 2026-01-29 11:29 pm (UTC)https://www.lemondededartagnan.org/sites/default/files/2023-12/le-mousquetaire-de-rocroi.pdf
(And people wore haut-de-chausses (i.e. from the waist to the knee) -- the garments later called culottes -- *not* the 'braies' adopted universally by the BBC Musketeers fandom to allude to men's nether garments, one of their favourite subjects :-p)
The contemporary illustrations on P2 are fascinating in that they show, not the King's Musketeers (an elite royal mounted troop equivalent to the Life Guard and the Royals) but the actual infantry drilling with muskets in their shabby clothing, including a worn-out scabbard through which the point of the sword protrudes ,and sagging false boot-tops, worn above unglamorous souliers to make it look as if the owner could afford to buy boots....
It dawned on me for the first time recently when watching clips from the Soviet Musketeers just *why* Cavalier boots have those enormous turned-down tops -- they are in fact thigh-length riding boots and worn as such (or were originally worn as such) when on horseback! Presumably they were turned down below the knee for convenience when dismounted, and then developed into an exaggerated fashion statement ;-)