Oh, she was writing Loki x Reader (or, at least, one of the two latest stories I looked at -- assuming I even got the right author -- was framed in the second person). It's just that the specific chapter she happened to have just published was Chapter One, all about the protagonist being up in her room waiting for the Royal Choosing, or whatever it was, so Loki didn't even make an appearance, let alone speak :-p And the other one was something about an imposter Loki (christened 'Faux-ki' by the author) who had aroused his wife's suspicion by being much too philanthropic and generally co-operative. I'm sure they were both working up to be being smut later on.
It occurs to me belatedly that the absence of purring in those particular chapters may not have been unrelated to the absence of smut ;-D
(I went back into her blog and tried to relocate them, but it had filled up with vast quantities of female salivation in the meantime, and I really couldn't take more than twelve pages of speculation on Tom Hiddleston's thighs...)
it's mainly second person narration, with the reader being the POV character. And the reader character is usually called Y/N (as in: insert your name here). :) Funny.
Yes, I came across that in the context of its being banned from FFNet. It seemed, and still seems, very weird to me; I find it impossible to imagine anybody identifying with a character literally called 'Your Name". If you really wanted to write smut that the reader could self-insert into (personally I can't think of anything less erotic than having *me* in there instead of having it happening to somebody else), then the obvious technique would be to write it in the first or second person without any names at all, with the protagonist just being addressed as 'darling' or whatever. The whole 'Y/N' thing just totally breaks immersion.
(And I've seen worse -- stories that expected you to insert 'your favourite food' or 'your favourite colour' into the spaces provided, presumably in the belief that this would create an extra-intense experience...)
Then again, I don't think that a character not having romantic relationships in the source material necessarily implies that he could not flirt or fall in love or have sex if the context was different.
There is, in fact, a very vocal community on Tumblr arguing that Loki must be aromantic because he's not making out with anyone in the movies. And I'm always thinking that maybe he's just caught up with other things, you know? :)
Well yes, I think that he has a lot of rather more important matters on his mind ;-p
No, the fact that you don't see a character actively pursuing romantic relationships in canon (particularly if the source material is action- rather than romance-oriented) definitely doesn't prove that the character in question is neither interested nor capable under other circumstances. It's a bit like assuming that all the members of a single-sex expedition must therefore be homosexuals, because everyone always needs sex All the Time and there is nobody else available... most people are quite capable of thinking about other things.
Lancard, for example, shows zero interest in romance and is rather cynical about it, but that doesn't mind that he is either 'aromantic' or harbouring some kind of unrequited crush on Raoul. It just means that we happen not to see him at a point in his life when romance would be even vaguely relevant to his activities; in forty years' time, assuming he lives that long, he will probably have a string of grandchildren (and possibly a discreet mistress on the side, depending on how far his regard for 'rules' and 'duty' takes him in that direction).
But Loki as master of smut appears to be a complete fandom fabrication. Although I suppose that as a master deceiver and manipulator he would arguably be pretty good at seduction if he turned his mind to it, so it's not a *complete* stretch...!
I was a bit envious of those authors when I first joined Tumblr. They have so many notes and reblogs and comments! Sometimes I post snippets from my wip, scenes that can sort of stand on their own without further context, and I have only four people reading them. XD
Yes, I saw one of the (non-smut) entries on that blog saying "Don't worry if you only have fifty notes on your latest work of fiction" and my immediate thought was that they clearly have a totally different scale of reader engagement!
Although oddly enough the most recent one-shot I (re-)posted on AO3 feels as if it is doing much better than normal, even though when I look at the raw stats it doesn't seem to be scoring all that highly in comparison to the rest; I think it's just that the other works have been up there much longer and have more time to accumulate hits etc. But at the moment it keeps showing up in the stats with several(!) hits per day and a whole load of people adding kudos, bookmarks, etc.
I suspect that people may be filtering actively for 'Raoul/Christine' and 'Fluff', since the other one-shot I did with those tags also did pretty well -- objectively, I think, better, but not so far as I recall in such a continuing rush at the start. (Where my definition of 'rush' consists of 'receives 16 kudos in 24 days' ;-p)
The fact that concrit is no longer the norm but an exception that is seldomly accepted. And I know that people who read my texts (few as they are, both the readers and my texts) would not consider saying, "I loved this, but that bit right there felt off." That's quite a loss.
To be fair, I'm not sure it was ever the case -- not from my memories of reading FFnet comments on stories from circa 2004, anyway, which were, as I recall, much more akin to Tumblr-style communication, since neither forums nor PMs existed on the site and there weren't a lot of external websites where fans could gather. It was just people chatting away and offering one another 'virtual cookies', and so on, quite as much as it was comment on the story itself -- let alone critique.
no subject
It occurs to me belatedly that the absence of purring in those particular chapters may not have been unrelated to the absence of smut ;-D
(I went back into her blog and tried to relocate them, but it had filled up with vast quantities of female salivation in the meantime, and I really couldn't take more than twelve pages of speculation on Tom Hiddleston's thighs...)
Yes, I came across that in the context of its being banned from FFNet. It seemed, and still seems, very weird to me; I find it impossible to imagine anybody identifying with a character literally called 'Your Name". If you really wanted to write smut that the reader could self-insert into (personally I can't think of anything less erotic than having *me* in there instead of having it happening to somebody else), then the obvious technique would be to write it in the first or second person without any names at all, with the protagonist just being addressed as 'darling' or whatever. The whole 'Y/N' thing just totally breaks immersion.
(And I've seen worse -- stories that expected you to insert 'your favourite food' or 'your favourite colour' into the spaces provided, presumably in the belief that this would create an extra-intense experience...)
Well yes, I think that he has a lot of rather more important matters on his mind ;-p
No, the fact that you don't see a character actively pursuing romantic relationships in canon (particularly if the source material is action- rather than romance-oriented) definitely doesn't prove that the character in question is neither interested nor capable under other circumstances. It's a bit like assuming that all the members of a single-sex expedition must therefore be homosexuals, because everyone always needs sex All the Time and there is nobody else available... most people are quite capable of thinking about other things.
Lancard, for example, shows zero interest in romance and is rather cynical about it, but that doesn't mind that he is either 'aromantic' or harbouring some kind of unrequited crush on Raoul. It just means that we happen not to see him at a point in his life when romance would be even vaguely relevant to his activities; in forty years' time, assuming he lives that long, he will probably have a string of grandchildren (and possibly a discreet mistress on the side, depending on how far his regard for 'rules' and 'duty' takes him in that direction).
But Loki as master of smut appears to be a complete fandom fabrication. Although I suppose that as a master deceiver and manipulator he would arguably be pretty good at seduction if he turned his mind to it, so it's not a *complete* stretch...!
Yes, I saw one of the (non-smut) entries on that blog saying "Don't worry if you only have fifty notes on your latest work of fiction" and my immediate thought was that they clearly have a totally different scale of reader engagement!
Although oddly enough the most recent one-shot I (re-)posted on AO3 feels as if it is doing much better than normal, even though when I look at the raw stats it doesn't seem to be scoring all that highly in comparison to the rest; I think it's just that the other works have been up there much longer and have more time to accumulate hits etc. But at the moment it keeps showing up in the stats with several(!) hits per day and a whole load of people adding kudos, bookmarks, etc.
I suspect that people may be filtering actively for 'Raoul/Christine' and 'Fluff', since the other one-shot I did with those tags also did pretty well -- objectively, I think, better, but not so far as I recall in such a continuing rush at the start. (Where my definition of 'rush' consists of 'receives 16 kudos in 24 days' ;-p)
To be fair, I'm not sure it was ever the case -- not from my memories of reading FFnet comments on stories from circa 2004, anyway, which were, as I recall, much more akin to Tumblr-style communication, since neither forums nor PMs existed on the site and there weren't a lot of external websites where fans could gather. It was just people chatting away and offering one another 'virtual cookies', and so on, quite as much as it was comment on the story itself -- let alone critique.